There is a twitchy (more than just twitchy, really) man, alone in a ratty boarding house room. He has a photo of a girl (possibly his dead daughter?) and some related mementos. Often in the film there is some sort of scratching/destructive violence at one of the doors of the room like a monster is trying to get in. A man in a suit is there for a time and is present for/part of all of the dialogue. The suited man is possibly claiming to be a doctor or lawyer but maybe he's a demon of some sort? The twitchy man may already be dead?Anyway, if this rings any bells, leave a comment to that effect. Thanks. :)
| This Is My Life, Rated | |
| Life: | |
| Mind: | |
| Body: | |
| Spirit: | |
| Friends/Family: | |
| Love: | |
| Finance: | |
| Take the Rate My Life Quiz | |
4.4.2. SENDER / RESENT-SENDER
This field contains the authenticated identity of the AGENT (person, system or process) that sends the message. It is intended for use when the sender is not the author of the message, or to indicate who among a group of authors actually sent the message. If the contents of the "Sender" field would be completely redundant with the "From" field, then the "Sender" field need not be present and its use is discouraged (though still legal). In particular, the "Sender" field MUST be present if it is NOT the same as the "From" Field.
The Sender mailbox specification includes a word sequence which must correspond to a specific agent (i.e., a human user or a computer program) rather than a standard address. This indicates the expectation that the field will identify the single AGENT (person, system, or process) responsible for sending the mail and not simply include the name of a mailbox from which the mail was sent. For example in the case of a shared login name, the name, by itself, would not be adequate. The local-part address unit, which refers to this agent, is expected to be a computer system term, and not (for example) a generalized person reference which can be used outside the network text message context.
Since the critical function served by the "Sender" field is identification of the agent responsible for sending mail and since computer programs cannot be held accountable for their behavior, it is strongly recommended that when a computer program generates a message, the HUMAN who is responsible for that program be referenced as part of the "Sender" field mailbox specification.
Your result for The Kink Spectrum Analysis Test...
![]()
Not bad! You're probably not willing to try everything, but you have quite a few kinks. Or you strongly prefer one side of the fence. Look for another Green, or a Blue if you feel adventurous. Reds may be okay as well if they share one or two of your likings (see below). But stay away from Ultraviolets unless you want to radically spice up your sex life. You've been warned.
But I promised you a more detailed analysis, so here it is. Note that most scales are twofold: There are separate values for giving (active) and receiving (passive). If you scored high on one of them, you should look for a partner who scored high on the other. If you scored high on both of them, go for someone who is similar (or for multiple partners if you're into that). If you scored low on both, this probably is not your kind of kink.
You scored 48% giving and 23% receiving on oral.
You scored 11% giving and 10% receiving on anal.
You scored 31% giving and 0% receiving on bondage.
You scored 7% giving and 5% receiving on humiliation.
You scored 22% giving and 0% receiving on pain.
You scored 18% dominance and 13% submission.
You scored 54% voyeurism and 33% exhibitionism.
Besides that, you're 19% into fetishism and 80% polysexual (i.e. interested in sex with multiple partners, whether at the same time or not). You'll probably want a partner who is similar, whether you scored high or low in these categories.
Finally, you scored 13% on autoerotic - a scale that measures your ability and/or willingness to have kinky fun without a partner. It's not exactly a matching criterion, but it's good for you if your score is high. Keep it up!


phyxius tagged me. Here are the rules:
“It works like this: if you use Flickr, go to the sixth page of your photostream and pick the sixth picture there, then post it to your blog, and pass it on to six other people.”
I'm not gonna tag anyone though. Just play along if you like.
You...
use Twitter, find my "Tweet" posts annoying, and want me to discontinue "Tweet" posts.![]()
![]()
2 (5.7%)
don't use Twitter, find my "Tweet" posts annoying, and want me to discontinue "Tweet" posts.![]()
![]()
8 (22.9%)
use Twitter, don't find my "Tweet" posts annoying, and want me to discontinue "Tweet" posts.![]()
![]()
2 (5.7%)
don't use Twitter, don't find my "Tweet" posts annoying, and want me to discontinue "Tweet" posts.![]()
![]()
1 (2.9%)
use Twitter, find my "Tweet" posts annoying, and want me to continue "Tweet" posts.![]()
![]()
1 (2.9%)
don't use Twitter, find my "Tweet" posts annoying, and want me to continue "Tweet" posts.![]()
![]()
1 (2.9%)
use Twitter, don't find my "Tweet" posts annoying, and want me to continue "Tweet" posts.![]()
![]()
14 (40.0%)
don't use Twitter, don't find my "Tweet" posts annoying, and want me to continue "Tweet" posts.![]()
![]()
6 (17.1%)